Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1040947
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T15:17:15+00:00 2026-05-16T15:17:15+00:00

It is necessary to check implementation of ‘MyMethod’ virtual method in the abstract ‘MyAbstractClass’:

  • 0

It is necessary to check implementation of ‘MyMethod’ virtual method in the abstract ‘MyAbstractClass’:

public abstract MyAbstractClass
{
    public void MyMethod()
    {
        Testpassed = true;
    }

    public abstract int StatusCode{get;internal set;} // **EDIT**: internal setter was added

    public bool TestPassed{get;private set;}
}

I’ve tried to do the following:

[TestMethod()]
{
    Mock<MyAbstractClass> mockClass = new Mock<MyAbstractClass>();
    mockClass.Object.MyMethod();
    Assert.IsTrue(mockClass.Object.TestPassed);
}

on attempt to execute ‘MyMethod’ the following error is generated:

Method ‘set_StatusCode’ in type
‘MyAbstractClass`2Proxy0434d60c0f4542fb9b4667ead4ca3a18’
from assembly ‘DynamicProxyGenAssembly2,
Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null’ does not have an
implementation..

Please advise, how could I get the problem resolved?

Thanks a lot!

P.S. Actually, I could inherit from MyAbstractClass and provide implementation for ‘StatusCode’ property, but I have a bunch of properties to be implemented…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T15:17:16+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 3:17 pm

    See this answer about partial mocking and I think you’ll have to provide a concrete implementation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it necessary to check all the field in equals method of model class
Is it necessary to check for nullptr after allocating an object using gcnew?
Consider the following snippet. qIn is a BlockingQueue , LinkedBlockingQueue implementation while (true) {
A question about interview street input constraints. (http://interviewstreet.com/) Is it necessary to check the
For example: .method private hidebysig instance void Insert(!TKey key, !TValue 'value', bool add) cil
Does anyone know the script necessary to check to see if you are in
in jQuery, is it necessary to check if the variable contains something or jQuery
Is the double check lock pattern necessary when using ReaderWriterLockSlim ? Consider this scenario:
not necessary an UML diagram, just a simple way to graphically document the relations
I installed all the necessary packages for running GUI programs in Cygwin. Right now,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.