Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8720083
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T06:57:00+00:00 2026-06-13T06:57:00+00:00

It is possible with Ninject (Most recent version) to bind an interface to a

  • 0

It is possible with Ninject (Most recent version) to bind an interface to a type in a specific class ? By that i mean… lets say i have two classes..

ClassA and ClassB, both have IContext injection in the constructor.. it is possible to say bind type IContext to ContextA for ClassA and IContext to ContextB to ClassB ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T06:57:01+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 6:57 am

    Instead of using named bindings you can also use conditional bindings which requires less code and is more typesafe:

    Bind<IContext>().To<ContextA>().WhenInjectedInto<SomeClassThatNeedsAContext>();
    Bind<IContext>().To<ContextB>().WhenInjectedInto<SomeOtherClassThatNeedsBContext>();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it at all possible to configure Ninject to load modules that have been
Is it possible to know that particular dependency already has been satisfied by ninject
I have a package Ninject.Extensisons.Wcf which shall be installed differently depending on the type
I have a static SessionFactory class that initializes an NHibernate session factory. Because this
Using Ninject 2.2, I have the following failing test (simplified): public interface IGenericView<T> {
I have read in a few places that you can compile Ninject to work
I have a simply Class that is intended to be a simple POCO -
Is it possible to add a new object that Ninject should be responsible for
I am trying to Bind two concrete classes to one interface. What command should
I have an ELMAH custom ErrorLog that uses an EF Code-First context to store

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.