Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 938279
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:37:02+00:00 2026-05-15T21:37:02+00:00

It is said that the web servers’ clocks must be identical for the Expires

  • 0

It is said that the web servers’ clocks must be identical for the Expires and Cache-Control headers to work? Why is that? Can’t they be off by 1 second or a few minutes?

If the cache is supposed to be good for 1 year, then won’t a time difference of a few minutes or even a few hours not matter on one or some of the web servers?

In the documentation it is said that:

note that in order for this [caching] to
work, all your application servers
must return the same timestamps. This
means that they must have their clocks
synchronized. If one of them drifts
out of sync, you‘ll see different
timestamps at random and the cache
won‘t work. In that case the browser
will request the same assets over and
over again even thought they didn‘t
change. You can use something like
Live HTTP Headers for Firefox to
verify that the cache is indeed
working.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:37:03+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:37 pm

    If you run ntpd on all your hosts (and you do, don’t you?) they’ll be more than close enough. It has less to do with the headers than with the caching controllers generating the ?1232285206 at the end of the URLs. That’s just a Unix epoch time (seconds since 00:00:00 Jan 1 1970), so being within a few seconds should do just fine for content that is okay to cache. ntpd typically keeps a quarter-second or less tolerance. (In a series of ntpdate tests against multiple time servers, my computer was never more than .15 seconds off.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

in this answer he said that i can use RIA services while creating my
On various places they said that you should use @ManagedProperty to get a request
At the Velocity 2010 conference, Google said that header compression can yield big gains
Folks, we all know that IP blacklisting doesn't work - spammers can come in
I developed a asp.net 2.0 web service (.asmx), now my client said that there
Somebody said that when your PHP code and application use global variables then it
It is said that fork system call creates a clone of the calling process,
In manual it said that InnoDB has row-level locking, so why if I select
Before someone said that I did not read I may say that I read
No one said that OrderedDictionary is having two copies of elements, one in a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.