Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 397351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:38:30+00:00 2026-05-12T16:38:30+00:00

It is similar in problem to this bug Question about storing array in a

  • 0

It is similar in problem to this bug

Question about storing array in a std::vector in C++

but for a different reason (see below).

For the following sample program in C++:

#include <vector>

int main(int c_, char ** v_)
{
        const int LENGTH = 100;

        std::vector<char[LENGTH]> ca_vector;

        return 0;

}

GCC 4.2.3 compiles cleanly.
GCC 4.3.2 emits the following errors:

/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h: In function ‘void std::_Destroy(_Tp*) [with _Tp = char [100]]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h:103:   instantiated from ‘void std::_Destroy(_ForwardIterator, _ForwardIterator) [with _ForwardIterator = char (*)[100]]’
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h:128:   instantiated from ‘void std::_Destroy(_ForwardIterator, _ForwardIterator, std::allocator&) [with _ForwardIterator = char (*)[100], _Tp = char [100]]’
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_vector.h:300:   instantiated from ‘std::vector::~vector() [with _Tp = char [100], _Alloc = std::allocator]’
test.cpp:7:   instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h:88: error: request for member ‘~char [100]’ in ‘* __pointer’, which is of non-class type ‘char [100]’

The reason apparently is this bit in

include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h 

  template
    inline void
    _Destroy(_Tp* __pointer)
    { __pointer->~_Tp(); }

which is called, I think, due to incorrect array-to-pointer-decay.

My question is:
Is there anything in language standard preventing storage of arrays in std::vector? Or is it just a bug in that special GCC version?

I do believe that this should compile (i.e. 4.2.3 is correct).

Thanks
martin

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:38:30+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:38 pm

    Yes there is something in the standard stopping using arrays Using Draft C++98 Standard

    Section 23 Containers

    The type of objects stored in these components must meet the requirements of CopyConstructible
    types (20.1.3), and the additional requirements of Assignabletypes.

    where components are various containers

    20.1.3 includes the requirement that the type has to have a destructor.

    I think of it as a vector has to copy allocate and delete elements. How does C++ know to copy or delete a char[] ?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 383k
  • Answers 383k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The following expression will do the job by using a… May 14, 2026 at 10:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need XmlDoc.LoadXml if you're going to load a string.… May 14, 2026 at 10:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You have the direct answer to your question here. Use… May 14, 2026 at 10:56 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.