Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 688747
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:15:41+00:00 2026-05-14T02:15:41+00:00

It looks like in most browsers, an <input type=submit> treats both [spacebar] and [enter]

  • 0

It looks like in most browsers, an <input type="submit"> treats both [spacebar] and [enter] as a click, but an <a> link only treats [enter] as a click.

My app uses a number of links formatted to simulate buttons, so a user that is accustomed to tabbing to a button and pressing [spacebar] will be frustrated.

This bit of jQuery solves the problem:

$("a.Button").die("keypress").live("keypress", function(e) {
    if (e.which == 32) {
        $(this).trigger("click");
        e.preventDefault();
    }
});

My question: Is there a reason not to do this? I’m a little reluctant to override the browser’s default behavior on something as basic as this, but since I’m already abusing the link tag to make it look like a button, at least this way I’m not violating the user’s expectations any further.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:15:41+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:15 am

    I think the most important standard to maintain is not the browser’s behaviour, but rather the user’s expected response.

    If you have overriden the display of links by turning them into buttons, the user must be able to treat those “buttons” exactly as they would if it were a real button, otherwise you will confuse and irritate users who have spent years with this “learnt” behaviour.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In most browsers, an input type=file has the following files property: document.getElementById(my-input).files This can
It looks like this template tag works like a charm for most people: http://blog.localkinegrinds.com/2007/09/06/digg-style-pagination-in-django/
I have a 2d array that looks like this: XX xx What's the most
Looks like this question has been asked thousand times already, but each person's configuration
jQuery hashchange event For me it looks like most mature solution right now(please correct
Most of the ASP.NET MVC paging solutions I have found by googling look like
Most video codecs are optimized for movies. However, not all videos look like real-world
Looks like while( condition ) { //do stuff } is completely equivalent to for(
Looks like ExpressionTrees compiler should be near with the C# spec in many behaviors,
Looks like there is no Load event for usercontrol on the CF. I'm used

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.