Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 554449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T11:42:38+00:00 2026-05-13T11:42:38+00:00

It must be something specific in my code, which I can’t post. But maybe

  • 0

It must be something specific in my code, which I can’t post. But maybe someone can suggest possible causes.

Basically I have:

class CParent
{
 public:
  void doIt(int x);
};
class CChild : public CParent
{
 public:
  void doIt(int x,int y,int z);
};

CChild *pChild = ...
pChild->doIt(123); //FAILS compiler, no method found
CParent *pParent = pChild;
pParent->doIt(123); //works fine

How on earth?

EDIT: people are talking about shadowing/hiding. But the two versions of doIt have different numbers of parameters. Surely that can’t confuse the compiler, overloads in child class which can’t possibly be confused with the parent class version? Can it?

The compiler error I get is:
error C2660: ‘CChild::doIt’ : function does not take 1 argument

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T11:42:39+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:42 am

    You have shadowed a method. For example:

    struct base
    {
        void method(int);
        void method(float);
    };
    
    struct derived : base
    {
        void method(int);
        // base::method(int) is not visible.
        // base::method(float) is not visible.
    };
    

    You can fix this with a using directive:

    class derived : public base
    {
        using base::method; // bring all of them in.
    
        void method(int);
        // base::method(int) is not visible.
        // base::method(float) is visible.
    };
    

    Since you seem insistent about the number of parameters, I’ll address that. That doesn’t change anything. Observe:

    struct base
    {
        void method(int){}
    };
    
    struct derived : base
    {
        void method(int,int){}
        // method(int) is not visible.
    };
    
    struct derived_fixed : base
    {
        using base::method;
        void method(int,int){}
    };
    
    int main(void)
    {
        {
            derived d;
    
            d.method(1, 2); // will compile
            d.method(3); // will NOT compile
        }
        {
            derived_fixed d;
    
            d.method(1, 2); // will compile
            d.method(3); // will compile
        }
    }
    

    It will still be shadowed regardless of parameters or return types; it’s simply the name that shadows. using base::<x>; will bring all of base‘s “<x>” methods into visibility.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 357k
  • Answers 357k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The other answers are correct. Here is some code you… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you ruin the noConflict concept by reassigning the jquery to… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you get that particular error, you don't actually have… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am

Related Questions

No related questions found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.