Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 450645
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T21:53:22+00:00 2026-05-12T21:53:22+00:00

It seems a lot of libraries/plugins use this syntax: def self.included(base) # :nodoc: base.extend

  • 0

It seems a lot of libraries/plugins use this syntax:

  def self.included(base) # :nodoc:
    base.extend ClassMethods
  end

Why is the :nodoc: part necessary?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T21:53:23+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 9:53 pm

    It is not necessary. If applied to a class, it just suppresses documentation (rdoc) for all the methods in the Class extension. Described in Programming Ruby as:

    :nodoc: –
    Don’t include this element in
    the documentation. For classes and
    modules, the methods, aliases,
    constants, and attributes directly
    within the affected class or module
    will also be omitted from the
    documentation. By default, though,
    modules and classes within that class
    or module will be documented.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This question seems to have been asked a lot, but I haven't seen an
I have read a lot about this issue but mine still seems to be
This question seems to have been asked a lot but all were trying to
It seems like a lot of people here and on many programmer wikis/blogs/ect. elsewhere
So it seems like a lot of people are playing the blame game around
From discussions I've had about language design, it seems like a lot of people
There seems to be a lot of heated discussion on the net about the
It seems like there is a lot of overhead involved in rapidly opening and
It seems to me like there's a lot of sheeping going on, with everyone
We seems to be abstracting a lot of logic way from web pages and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.