Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 594205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:55:43+00:00 2026-05-13T15:55:43+00:00

It seems I can use self or this for referring to the mixed-in instance

  • 0

It seems I can use self or this for referring to the mixed-in instance or rather to constraint the mixed-in instance. For instance, are those equivalent?

scala> trait A { self: List[_] => }
defined trait A

scala> trait B { this: List[_] => }
defined trait B

Is this just a convention, or using something different than this provide some benefits?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:55:43+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:55 pm

    Using a name other than “this” can be useful where you have member types which refer to the enclosing instance. For example,

    trait Outer { self =>
      trait Inner {
        def outer = self
      }
    }
    

    is preferable to,

    trait Outer {
      trait Inner {
        def outer = Outer.this
      }
    }
    

    in some circumstances.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It seems like I can't use shell_exec or proc_open on my shared server. The
How can I use command line arguments in a creationComplete event handler? It seems
It seems that in the future, we can just use the non-beta iPhone SDK
every introduction and sample that I can find seems to use GLUT or some
I'm sorry if the question looks stupid,but It seems I can't use my head
jQuery's getScript function doesn't seem to support an error callback function. I can't use
I can't seem to find an easy to use, .net native way to get
I can't seem to find a good script or anything to use for installing
I'm trying to use the NDK with C++ and can't seem to get the
I'm trying to use checkstyle for a java project but I can't seem to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.