Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 681315
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:28:12+00:00 2026-05-14T01:28:12+00:00

It seems like there used to be way more binary protocols because of the

  • 0

It seems like there used to be way more binary protocols because of the very slow internet speeds of the time (dialup). I’ve been seeing everything being replaced by HTTP and SOAP/REST/XML.

Why is this?

Are binary protocols really dead or are they just less popular? Why would they be dead or less popular?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:28:12+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:28 am

    You Just Can’t Beat the Binary

    Binary protocols will always be more space efficient than text protocols. Even as internet speeds drastically increase, so does the amount and complexity of information we wish to convey.

    The text protocols you reference are outstanding in terms of standardization, flexibility and ease of use. However, there will always be applications where the efficiency of binary transport will outweigh those factors.

    A great deal of information is binary in nature and will probably never be replaced by a text protocol. Video streaming comes to mind as a clear example.

    Even if you compress a text-based protocol (e.g. with GZip), a general purpose compression algorithm will never be as efficient as a binary protocol designed around the specific data stream.

    But Sometimes You Don’t Have To

    The reason you are seeing more text-based protocols is because transmission speeds and data storage capacity have indeed grown fast compared to the data size for a wide range of applications. We humans find it much easier to work with text protocols, so we designed our ubiquitous XML protocol around a text representation. Certainly we could have created XML as a binary protocol, if we really had to save every byte, and built common tools to visualize and work with the data.

    Then Again, Sometimes You Really Do

    Many developers are used to thinking in terms of multi-GB, multi-core computers. Even your typical phone these days puts my first IBM PC-XT to shame. Still, there are platforms such as embedded devices, that have rather strict limitations on processing power and memory. When dealing with such devices, binary may be a necessity.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am used to the c-style getchar() , but it seems like there is
In my web.config file there are below entries. It seems like it is used
It seems like there should be a removalAllOccuring(Collection) (or similiar) method in Multiset. A
I been wondering about this for a while. It seems like there are so
It seems to me like there's a lot of sheeping going on, with everyone
cgi.escape seems like one possible choice. Does it work well? Is there something that
Well is there? From everything I've read, it seems like the answer is no,but
Is there any intrinsic support for namespacing in coffeescript? Adequate namespacing seems like something
replace newline seems to be a question asked here and there like hundred times
It seems there is very few comparison between Selenium / WatiN and SimpleTest (which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.