Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6545211
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T11:33:30+00:00 2026-05-25T11:33:30+00:00

It seems to me that defining static namedQueries = {} in a subclass of

  • 0

It seems to me that defining

static namedQueries = {} 

in a subclass of a hierarchy masks completely the super class’s namedQueries declaration. Is there a way to get both working? Say using a super key word?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T11:33:31+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 11:33 am

    In Groovy 1.8 was added closure composition, which should allow you to do this via a left shift operator.

    static namedQueries = SuperClass.namedQueries << {
        myAdditionalQuery {
            ...
        }
    }
    

    But that won’t be available until Grails 2.0, as Grails 1.3.7 uses Groovy 1.7.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm curious if there is a platform neutral way of defining unit tests. Consider
When defining a PHP class, which is preferred/best practice? Are there any key differences
I'm completely stumped on how to get FreeType 2.4.8 compiled as a static lib
I've always found that defining URLs for other pages in a Web Application seems
Seems that requirements on safety do not seem to like systems that use AI
Seems that even after unchecking the option in the PyDev/Debug preferenecs pane to launch
It seems that a List object cannot be stored in a List variable in
It seems that it is impossible to capture the keyboard event normally used for
It seems that Silverlight/WPF are the long term future for user interface development with
It seems that most of the installers for Perl are centered around installing Perl

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.