Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 790775
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:43:58+00:00 2026-05-14T21:43:58+00:00

It seems to me that the Ruby community has been freaking out a little

  • 0

It seems to me that the Ruby community has been freaking out a little about autoload since this famous thread, discouraging its use for thread safety reasons.

Does anyone know if this is no longer an issue in Ruby 1.9.1 or 1.9.2? I’ve seen a bit of talk about wrapping requires in mutexes and such, but the 1.9 changelogs (or at least as much as I’ve been able to find) don’t seem to address this particular question. I’d like to know if I can reasonably start autoloading in 1.9-only libraries without any reasonable grief.

Thanks in advance for any insights.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:43:59+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:43 pm

    I don’t know about the general case, but repro example from that thread doesn’t break in 1.9.1:

    autoloaded.rb:

    sleep 1
    Bar::Foo = 1
    

    autoloader.rb:

    module Bar
       autoload :Foo, 'autoloaded.rb'
    end
    
    t1 = Thread.new { Bar::Foo }
    t2 = Thread.new { Bar::Foo }
    t1.join; t2.join
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been trying to run rake but it seems that ever since I
In every benchmark that I found on the web it seems that Ruby is
does FastCGI work well with PHP? It seems that some people running Ruby on
I'm enjoying Ruby on Rails but one thing that seems overwhelming is the shear
it seems that Ruby GTK apps are unable to run in nongraphical environment.. while
It seems that in language like C, Java, and Ruby (as opposed to Javascript),
It seems that inside of HAML's :javascript filter, no Ruby code is allowed, not
I am new to Ruby, and it seems that Ruby does support variables defined
After much reading on ruby on rails and multiple database connections, it seems that
So, in javascript since it's event-driven by its nature it seems that setTimeout doesn't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.