Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8793821
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T23:10:18+00:00 2026-06-13T23:10:18+00:00

It would be convenient to be able to say something like: for _, element

  • 0

It would be convenient to be able to say something like:

for _, element := reverse range mySlice {
        ...
}

Edit: I asked this question a long time ago, it is 2022 now and the generic solution by @Ivan below seems like the way to go!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T23:10:19+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 11:10 pm

    No there is no convenient operator for this to add to the range one in place. You’ll have to do a normal for loop counting down:

    s := []int{5, 4, 3, 2, 1}
    for i := len(s)-1; i >= 0; i-- {
       fmt.Println(s[i])
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It would be convenient to be able to specify a class object by its
I would like to be able to use Spring using setter injection into Scala
I have a snippet of code that looks something like this: data SomeData =
I know questions like this have been asked numerous times, but not quite this
I would like my client to be able to order items in the backend.
It would be so convenient to be able to lookup gl... functions either in
I look at a lot of small Java programs. It would be convenient if
Would like to parse IPv4 address from exit-addresses . Format of the file: ExitNode
Would be possible to extend this kind of layout so that I can have
Would it be wiser to check if a particular element exists on the page?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.