Home/ Questions/Q 114625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T02:53:26+00:00

It’s been at least 5 years since I worked with Java, and back then,

  • 0

It’s been at least 5 years since I worked with Java, and back then, any time you wanted to allocate an object that needed cleaning up (e.g. sockets, DB handles), you had to remember to add a finally block and call the cleanup method in there.

By contrast, in C++ (or other languages where object lifetimes are deterministic, e.g. Perl), the class implementor would define a destructor function that performs the cleanup whenever an object of that class goes out of scope. The advantage of this approach is that the user of the object can’t forget to clean it up — the destructor gets called automatically, even if an exception is thrown. This approach goes by the fairly awful name of RAII — ‘Resource Acquisition Is Initialisation’.

It’s been my experience that doing things ‘the RAII way’ has saved me a lot of mental overhead in terms of not having to worry about whether and when resource deallocations occur. We are considering using Java for a medium-sized project, and I’m wondering if some sort of deterministic destruction is among the many new features added to the language since I last looked at it. (I’m hopeful as my complaint that ‘Java has no RAII’ was rebuked on this thread, but so far I haven’t been able to find any details by googling.)

So if someone could point me to some introductory material on how to go about this in Java that would be great!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. EDIT: The answer below was written in early 2009, when Java 7 was very much still in flux.

    While Java still doesn’t provide guarantees around finalization timing, it did gain a feature like C#’s using statement: the try-with-resources statement.

    No, Java hasn’t changed at all in that respect. You still need to use try/finally.

    There’s been discussion of adding the equivalent of C#’s ‘using’ statement (which is syntactic sugar over try/finally) to Java, but I don’t think that’s going to be part of Java 7 any more. (Most of the language improvements seem to have been dropped.)

    It’s worth understanding that there are reasons why deterministic destruction hasn’t been implemented in Java and .NET in the form of a reference-counted garbage collector, by the way – that a) impacts performance and b) fails with circular references. Brian Harry wrote a detailed email about this – it’s about .NET and it’s rather old, but it’s well worth a close read.

    • 0