Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3333974
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:51:16+00:00 2026-05-17T23:51:16+00:00

Its been noted that access to data elements that fall in same cache-line performs

  • 0

Its been noted that access to data elements that fall in same cache-line performs badly due to ping-pong effect.
However, the code I wrote doesn’t and tested with valgrind –tool=cachegrind doesn’t show this behaviour. Would appreciate any insights regarding this?.

Attached below is function that each pthread executes:

   void test_cache(void* arg)    
   {    
    long id = (long) arg;  
    uint32_t idx = (uint32_t) id;  
    uint32_t ctr = 0;  
    uint32_t total_sum = 0;  
    for(; ctr < 500000; ++ctr)  
    {  
      total_sum += shared[idx];  
      AO_fetch_and_add(&shared[idx], idx);    
    }
    printf("%d %d,\n",id, total_sum);   
}  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:51:16+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:51 pm

    If you are running on a “dual core” whatever, you are hitting shared cache. You need separate physical CPUs to see the ping-pong effect. Include your hardware spec in the question.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been developing in asp.net since its existence (also classic asp before that)
Our WinForms application has been reported to occasionally just close on its own. It
I have been building IMO a really cool RIA. But its now close to
I'm sure this problem has been solved before and I'm curious how its done.
It's been mentioned to me that I'll be the sole developer behind a large
It's been a while since I've had to do any HTML-like code in Vim
It's been a while since I've programmed a GUI program, so this may end
It's been a while since I last coded arm assembler and I'm a little
It's been awhile since my algorithms class in school, so forgive me if my
It's been out for almost five years. It's got tens of millions of users

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.