Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3931440
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T23:21:07+00:00 2026-05-19T23:21:07+00:00

It’s impossible to friend a template parameter because the standard disallows it. How might

  • 0

It’s impossible to friend a template parameter because the standard disallows it. How might I get effectively the same thing then?

What I want is basically a type that is unusable outside the object which owns it. Why is rather beside the point but if you really must know, I’m trying to formulate a set of smart pointers that answer the problem of sharing an owned resource. Thus what I’m looking to do is something like so, if it worked:

template < typename T, typename Owner >
struct accessible_member
{
private:
  accessible_member() : val(T()) {}
  accessible_member(T const& t) : val(t) {}

  operator T& () { return val; }
  operator T const& () const { return val; }

  member_ptr<T> operator & () { return member_ptr<T>(val); }

  friend class Owner;
};

Thus a class can’t hold this object as a member unless it declares itself the owner, and if it’s silly enough to expose it as is, it will be impossible to use outside the class being so stupid.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T23:21:07+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 11:21 pm

    You could use this, and then let all the owners inherit from Owner.

    You could then use Owner class to wrap privately the methods used in accessible_member.
    accessible_member is now accessible to Owner. Friend is not inherited, so you can supply (wrap) the necessary methods so all the classes that inherit Owner can use accessible_member.

    It’s a 2 level solution but it keeps the level of encapsulation.

    template < typename U >
    struct Owner 
    {
       protected:
       accessible_member<U> newAccessible_member() { return accessible_member<U>(); }
       accessible_member<U> newAccessible_member(U const& u) { return accessible_member<U>(u); }
       .....
    
    };
    
    template < typename T >
    struct accessible_member
    {
    private:
      accessible_member() : val(T()) {}
      accessible_member(T const& t) : val(t) {}
    
      operator T& () { return val; }
      operator T const& () const { return val; }
    
      member_ptr<T> operator & () { return member_ptr<T>(val); }
    
    
      template < typename U> friend class Owner;
    };
    

    Then you can use the accessible_member indirectly in structs that inherit from Owner using the protected methods:

    struct Blah: Owner<int>
    {
       void Dosomething() {
           accessible_member<int> blah= newAccessible_member();
       }
    };
    

    Look at the last example at Template Friends.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
i want to parse a xhtml file and display in UITableView. what is the
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.