Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 117623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:21:56+00:00 2026-05-11T03:21:56+00:00

I’ve a application that must work after another application. This second application has a

  • 0

I’ve a application that must work after another application. This second application has a bug that causes COM ports not to be closed in specific circumstances.

I would like to close all COM ports programmatically in my application to ensure, that there will be no bugs about close ports reported. Is it possible if I do not own objects that opened COM ports?

I need a solution on .NET Framework, C# .

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:21:57+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:21 am

    There is no good, easy way:

    • A good way is to fix the other application; or if that’s impossible, to write a filter device driver (similar to the parport driver but for serial ports instead of parallel ports) which would sit on top of the serial port hardware driver and which would expose more than one connection point (one used by the other application, which passes through to the underlying real driver, and another ‘back door’ used by your own application … the real driver would only see one client, i.e. the filter driver wich sits on top of it)
    • An easy way is to nuke (forcibly terminate) the other process.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.