Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8567085
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T17:48:10+00:00 2026-06-11T17:48:10+00:00

I’ve always been under the impression that I shouldn’t define a variable inside of

  • 0

I’ve always been under the impression that I shouldn’t define a variable inside of a loop because it’s unnecessary or wasteful. This makes me wonder if the following recv() function needs a fresh buffer for each iteration of the loop:

while (totalBytesRecvd < echoStrLen)
{
    char buffer[BUFSIZE];
    numBytes = recv(sock, buffer, BUFSIZE - 1, 0);
    ...
    totalBytesRecvd += numBytes;
    buffer[numBytes] = '\0';
    fputs(buffer, stdout);
}

The documentation for recv() doesn’t mention anything about how it uses the buffer pointer. For a better understanding, I tried defining the buffer just before the loop, and recv() appears to overwrite the buffer, instead of redefining it. Which makes sense since recv() is passed a pointer to the beginning of the buffer.

Is there a specific reason to define a buffer over and over again inside of a loop? Or is my basic understanding of this correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T17:48:11+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 5:48 pm

    recv, as read and other similar functions, doesn’t care about the previous content of the buffer, it uses it just to write the result.

    Not that it would make a difference anyway: since you are not initializing your buffer, its content will be “undefined” even if you declare the variable as local to the loop.

    Also, on most C implementations:

    • not initializing that variable means that will take whatever happens to be on the stack at that location, which in turn means that it’ll be taking the same location as it were at the previous iteration, effectively giving you the exact same result as having the variable outside the loop.
    • stack allocations are cheap – in general they just require to adjust a register;
    • actually, they are even cheaper: usually the register adjustment is done just at the beginning of the function, accounting for all the local variables; the scoping of a local variable becomes just a compile-time construct, since it’s allocated when the function starts.

    Obviously, instead, if you initialized your variable it would be different – the code to perform the initialization would have to run at each iteration; but, as said above, there’s no need to initialize anything, recv just doesn’t care about the current state of the buffer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.