Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 103183
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:05:00+00:00 2026-05-11T01:05:00+00:00

I’ve become very addicted to Project Euler recently and am trying to do this

  • 0

I’ve become very addicted to Project Euler recently and am trying to do this one next! I’ve started some analysis on it and have reduced the problem down substantially already. Here’s my working:

A = pqr and

1/A = 1/p + 1/q + 1/r so pqr/A = pq + pr + qr

And because of the first equation:

pq+pr+qr = 1

Since exactly two of p, q and r have to be negative, we can simplify the equation down to finding:

abc for which ab = ac+bc+1

Solving for c we get:

ab-1 = (a+b)c

c = (ab-1)/(a+b)


This means we need to find a and b for which:

ab = 1 (mod a+b)

And then our A value with those a and b is:

A = abc = ab(ab-1)/(a+b)

Sorry if that’s a lot of math! But now all we have to deal with is one condition and two equations. Now since I need to find the 150,000th smallest integer written as ab(ab-1)/(a+b) with ab = 1 (mod a+b), ideally I want to search (a, b) for which A is as small as possible.

For ease I assumed a < b and I have also noticed that gcd(a, b) = 1.

My first implementation is straight forward and even finds 150,000 solutions fast enough. However, it takes far too long to find the 150,000 smallest solutions. Here’s the code anyway:

n = 150000 seen = set()  a = 3 while len(seen) < n:     for b in range(2, a):         if (a*b)%(a+b) != 1: continue          seen.add(a*b*(a*b-1)//(a+b))         print(len(seen), (a, b), a*b*(a*b-1)//(a+b))      a += 1 

My next thought was to use Stern-Brocot trees but that is just too slow to find solutions. My final algorithm was to use the Chinese remainder theorem to check if different values of a+b yield solutions. That code is complicated and although faster, it isn’t fast enough…

So I’m absolutely out of ideas! Anyone got any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:05:00+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:05 am

    As with many of the Project Euler problems, the trick is to find a technique that reduces the brute force solution into something more straight forward:

    A = pqr and  1/A = 1/p + 1/q + 1/r 

    So,

    pq + qr + rp = 1  or  -r = (pq - 1)/(p + q) 

    Without loss of generality, 0 < p < -q < -r

    There exists k , 1 <= k <= p

    -q = p + k -r = (-p(p + k) – 1) / (p + -p – k)  = (p^2 + 1)/k + p 

    But r is an integer, so k divides p^2 + 1

    pqr = p(p + q)((p^2 + 1)/k + p) 

    So to compute A we need to iterate over p, and where k can only take values which are divisors of p squared plus 1.

    Adding each solution to a set, we can stop when we find the required 150000th Alexandrian integer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.