Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6674605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:45:55+00:00 2026-05-26T03:45:55+00:00

I’ve been doing some sax parsing in Java recently. I noticed the initialization for

  • 0

I’ve been doing some sax parsing in Java recently. I noticed the initialization for namespace mappings

private Map<String,String> namespaceMappings = new HashMap<String,String>();

my question is why we create a Map variable instead of HashMap here?
Further, if I’m going to have the getNamespaceMappings field, what type should I return?

public Map<String,String> getNamespaceMappings() {
    return namespaceMappings;
}

or

public HashMap<String,String> getNamespaceMappings() {
    return (HashMap<String,String>) namespaceMappings;
}

or

public Map<String,String> getNamespaceMappings() {
    return (HashMap<String,String>) namespaceMappings;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:45:56+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:45 am

    You should always declare variables and return types as the least specialized classes possible, or, ideally, as interfaces, so that you can at any time change the implementation.

    For example, if at some point you decide you want to use a TreeMap instead of a HashMap, then you’d only need to change:

    private Map<String,String> namespaceMappings = new HashMap<String,String>();
    

    to:

    private Map<String,String> namespaceMappings = new TreeMap<String,String>();
    

    No other change needed in the code.

    The most value you get out of this though is with what your class makes public. So for example, if you had the method getNamespaceMappings() return a Map, then every piece of code using that method will simply know that they will be using a Map. If at some point you decide to internally represent this map as something other than a HashMap, then you’ll keep this internal to your class.

    If you make the method return a HashMap instead, then you’re exposing implementation details. In the future, if you want to use something other than a HashMap, then all the code using this class will need to be changed to accommodate this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
public static bool CheckLogin(string Username, string Password, bool AutoLogin) { bool LoginSuccessful; // Trim

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.