Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8699955
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T02:04:31+00:00 2026-06-13T02:04:31+00:00

I’ve been experimenting with function types in C++. Note that I don’t mean pointer-to-function

  • 0

I’ve been experimenting with function types in C++. Note that I don’t mean pointer-to-function types like:

typedef void (*voidFuncPtr)();

but the more exotic:

typedef void (voidFunc)();

I didn’t expect the following code to compile, but surprisingly it did:

template<voidFunc func>
class funcClass
{
public:
    void call() { func(); };
};

void func()
{ }

void Test()
{
    funcClass<func> foobar;
    foobar.call();
}

however, if I try adding the following to funcClass:

voidFuncPtr get() { return &func; }

I get the error Address expression must be an lvalue or a function designator

My first question here is: what kind of black magic is the compiler using to pretend that a func type is something it can actually pass around an instance of? Is it just treating it like a reference? Second question is: if it can even be called, why can’t the address of it be taken? Also, what are these non-pointer-to function types called? I only discovered them because of boost::function, and have never been able to find any documentation about them.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T02:04:33+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:04 am

    §14.1.4 of the Standard says:

    A non-type template-parameter shall have one of the following (optionally cv-qualified) types:

    — integral or enumeration type,

    — pointer to object or pointer to function, [this is what yours is]

    — lvalue reference to object or lvalue reference to function,

    — pointer to member,

    — std::nullptr_t.

    And §14.1.6 says

    A non-type non-reference template-parameter is a prvalue. It shall not
    be assigned to or in any other way have its value changed. A non-type
    non-reference template-parameter cannot have its address taken
    . When a
    non-type non-reference template-parameter is used as an initializer
    for a reference, a temporary is always used.

    So that explains the two behaviours you are seeing.

    Note that func is the same as &func (§14.3.2.1):

    [A non-type template parameter can be] a constant expression (5.19) that designates the address of an object with static storage duration and external or internal linkage or a
    function with external or internal linkage, including function
    templates and function template-ids but excluding non-static class
    members, expressed (ignoring parentheses) as & id-expression, except
    that the & may be omitted if the name refers to a function or array
    and shall be omitted if the corresponding template-parameter is a
    reference; or…

    So it’s just a function pointer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.