Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6567421
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T14:20:05+00:00 2026-05-25T14:20:05+00:00

I’ve been googling for a couple hours on this issue to no eval. WELD

  • 0

I’ve been googling for a couple hours on this issue to no eval.

WELD docs and the CDI spec are pretty clear regarding thread safety of the scopes provided.

For example:

  • Application Scope – not safe

  • Session Scope – not safe

  • Request Scope – safe, always bound to a single thread

  • Conversation Scope – safe (due to the WELD proxy serializing access from multiple request threads)

I can’t find anything on the View Scope defined by JSF 2.x.

It is in roughly the same bucket as the Conversation Scope in that it is very possible for multiple requests to hit the scope concurrently despite it being bound to a single view / user. What I don’t know is if the JSF implementation serializes access to the bean from multiple requests.

Anyone have knowledge of the spec or of the Morraja/MyFaces implementations that could clear this up?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T14:20:06+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:20 pm

    The view scope is with normal usage thread safe. It can be used by only one browser window/tab. Namely, it’s keyed by an unique hidden input field which is set on the initial GET request. Every postback on the same view will use the one and same view scoped bean. The browser itself already "synchronizes" postback requests in the same window/tab. A new browser window/tab is effectively a new GET request and will therefore create a new and completely independent view.

    As to ajax postbacks, they are by specification queued. This is mentioned in chapter 13.3.2 of the JSF 2 specification:

    13.3.2 Ajax Request Queueing

    All Ajax requests must be put into a client side request queue before they are sent to the
    server to ensure Ajax requests are processed in the order they are sent. The request that has been waiting in the queue the
    longest is the next request to be sent. After a request is sent, the Ajax request callback function must remove the request
    from the queue (also known as dequeuing). If the request completed successfully, it must be removed from the queue. If
    there was an error, the client must be notified, but the request must still be removed from the queue so the next request
    can be sent. The next request (the oldest request in the queue) must be sent. Refer to the jsf.ajax.request
    JavaScript documentation for more specifics about the Ajax request queue.

    Only when using PrimeFaces, queueing can be disabled with <p:ajax async="true">. When using this in combination with view scoped beans, threadsafety must be reconsidered the same way as for session scoped beans.

    See also:

    • Concurrency of @ApplicationScoped JSF managed beans
    • Help me to understand JSF managed bean scope from concurrency view
    • How to choose the right bean scope?
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.