Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 890819
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:47:39+00:00 2026-05-15T13:47:39+00:00

I’ve been having a problem with a pesky little function in a class in

  • 0

I’ve been having a problem with a pesky little function in a class in a library that I did not create (and thus, cannot edit). Here’s a simple class with the annoying behavior isolated:

class Foo              # This is a class I cannot
  def setmyproc(&code) # safely edit.
    @prc = Proc.new    # Due to it being in a
  end                  # frustratingly complex
  def callmyproc()     # hierarchy, I don't
    @prc.call          # even know how to reopen
  end                  # it. Consider this class
end                    # set in stone.

I run into a problem when I try to iterate and generate an array of these objects. I expected a different value to be substituted for i into the Proc with each object, but what happens instead is that the variable i is shared between them.

$bar = []
for i in (0..15)
  $bar[i] = Foo.new
  $bar[i].setmyproc { puts i }
end

$bar[3].callmyproc # expected to print 3
$bar[6].callmyproc # expected to print 6

Output

  15
  15

What can I do inside the loop to preserve separate values of i for each object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:47:39+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:47 pm

    Use this:

    $bar = []
    (0..15).each do |i|
      $bar[i] = Foo.new
      $bar[i].setmyproc { puts i }
    end
    
    $bar[3].callmyproc # prints 3
    $bar[6].callmyproc # prints 6
    

    If you really need to make the change inside of the loop, use this (ruby 1.9 only):

    $bar = []
    for i in (0..15)
      ->(x) do
        $bar[x] = Foo.new
        $bar[x].setmyproc { puts x }
      end.(i)
    end
    
    $bar[3].callmyproc # prints 3
    $bar[6].callmyproc # prints 6
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 453k
  • Answers 453k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is about as friendly an introduction as I could… May 15, 2026 at 9:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Remember that this is plain Ruby, so you can simply… May 15, 2026 at 9:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Objective-C has multiple-level dispatch, so it's possible that the method… May 15, 2026 at 9:36 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.