Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8514707
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T04:56:39+00:00 2026-06-11T04:56:39+00:00

I’ve been in many situations where my core logic is in private methods. How

  • 0

I’ve been in many situations where my core logic is in private methods.
How would you go about unit testing that, is there any kind of compile time manipulation to ignore compile errors for unknown/private methods? I know that for the second part of the code I could use performSelector, but is that a reasonable solution?

For instance:

[[self.objectMock expect] privateMethod];
or 
[self.object callPrivateMethodsToExpectSomeOtherBehaviour]

EDIT:

Here is an example to demonstrate why I feel like I need to test some private methods.
Are these tests not reasonable? How else would I test that calling clear actually does what it suppose to do?

- (void)clear
{
   self.orderNumber = nil;
   [self.items removeAllObjects];
   // Clear the rest of fields
}

- (void)testClearShouldRemoveOrderNumber
{
   Order *order = [[Order alloc] init];
   OCMockObject *orderPartialMock = [OCmockObject partialMockForObject:order];

   [[orderPartialMock.items expect] setOrderNumber:nil];
   [orderPartialMock clear];
   [orderPartialMock verify];
}

- (void)testClearShouldRemoveItems
{
    Order *order = [[Order alloc] init];
    order.items = [[OCMockObject niceMockForClass:[NSMutableArray class]];

    [[orderPartialMock.items expect] removeAllObjects];
    [orderPartialMock performSelector@selector(clear)];
    [orderPartialMock.items verify];
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T04:56:41+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 4:56 am

    Methods are never “private” in the sense that once a class implements a method, it can be sent my anyone.

    So, let’s say you have a class Foo with a “private” method bar that is not in the interface declaration. You could, from anywhere, still invoke bar though you may get a compiler diagnostic.

    Probably the simplest approach is to declare the methods in a category that your tests use. For example:

    @interface Foo (MyPrivateMethodsUsedForTesting)
    - (void)bar;
    @end
    

    Now, you can use them without the compiler complaining either. Note, the methods do not have to be implemented in an actual MyPrivateMethodsUsedForTesting category. This technique is also sometimes referred to as an “informal protocol.”

    EDIT

    Also, as noted by others, that if you need to access private methods, you probably should revisit your design. After ~30 years doing this, there are definitely times where, especially for tests, you need to access private stuff, but most times it means some type of design review is in order.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.