Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’ve been looking into MVVM toolkits, and MVVM light really appeals to me, especially do to it’s focus on “blendability”. I put forth the proposal to our engineering team that we move to using it as our go to toolkit for all SL development, and although most people agreed that it was nice, they couldn’t understand why BaseViewModel doesn’t implement the IDataErrorInfo interface.
Is this an intentional decision in mvvm-light, if so, can someone fill me on why?
IDataErrorInfo is not suitable for all places where you might use a view model. For example, if you’ve chosen to have a menu backed by view model objects, how would you use IDataErrorInfo in conjunction with a view model that represents a menu item?