Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1019335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T10:59:50+00:00 2026-05-16T10:59:50+00:00

I’ve been playing around with Python’s imaplib and email module recently. I tried sending

  • 0

I’ve been playing around with Python’s imaplib and email module recently. I tried sending and receiving large emails (with most of the data in the body of the email rather than attachments) using the imaplib/email modules.

However, I’ve noticed a problem when I download large emails (of size greater than 8MB or so) from the email server and format them using the “email.message_from_string()” method. The time taken by that method seems to take a really long time (average of around 300-310 seconds for a 16 MB email). Note: Sending such a large email doesn’t take too much time, about 40 seconds approximately. Again, all the data is in the body of the email — not in the attachments. If I download the same email with all the data as attachments, the entire operation finishes in 30-40 seconds.
This is what I’m doing:

buf = []
t, d = mailacct.search(None, 'SUBJECT', subj)
for num in d:
    t, msg = mailacct.fetch(num, '(RFC822)')

    for resp in msg:
        if isinstance(resp, tuple):
            buf.append(email.message_from_string(resp[1])

I’ve timed each part of the code separately. mailacct.search and mailacct.fetch both finish in about 30-40 seconds for a 16 MB email. The line with email.message_from_string(resp[1]) takes around 280-300 seconds.

I’m a python noob. So am I doing something really inefficient in the above code? Or does the problem lie with the email.message_from_string() method, perhaps an inefficient implementation? Or could it be that email bodies were never meant to contain large amounts of data, and hence the poor performance?

* EDIT *:
Additional info: I used imaplib.IMAP4_SSL for creating IMAP connections. I used imaplib.append() to upload messages to the email account first. I used randomly generated binary data for the payload.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T10:59:50+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:59 am

    Okay, I did some digging on my own by examining the source code for the email module. The parsing function (parse()) in email/parser.py is the function which actually processes the email message when email.message_from_string() is called. It seems to parse strings in blocks of 8192 bytes which is why it takes so long for large data. I changed the code so that it read and processed the whole string at once and there was a tremendous improvement in the time taken to process the large email message.

    I’m assuming it was initially set to process strings in blocks of 8192 to handle really really large strings? Is there a better way to do this rather than changing the email module source code?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I'm looking for suggestions for debugging... If you view this site in Firefox or
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.