Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8613563
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T04:54:32+00:00 2026-06-12T04:54:32+00:00

I’ve been profiling some part of my application and I’ve found out that PgAdmin3

  • 0

I’ve been profiling some part of my application and I’ve found out that
PgAdmin3 is significantly faster than psql at executing the exact same script.
I’m using unix sockets, Ubuntu 12.04 and Postgresql 9.1 and pgadmin3 v1.14. I have a simple script like the following:

BEGIN
INSERT INTO key_value(section,key,value) VALUES('section','key1','value');
....
INSERT INTO key_value(section,key,value) VALUES('section','key10000','value');
COMMIT;

Here is the table:

CREATE TABLE key_value
(
  key text NOT NULL,
  value text,
  CONSTRAINT key_value_pkey PRIMARY KEY (section , key )
)
WITH (
  OIDS=FALSE
);

There are 10000 inserts in this script. Executing it in pgadmin3 takes around 0.5 seconds, executing it in psql takes 2.5~3.5 seconds. Both are wrapped in a transaction so there should be really no difference. Results are consistent afer recreating the table, doing a full vacuum etc. Logging in the Postgresql server shows postgres doing a log for every insert statement when being executed in psql but only one log when being executed from pgadmin3.

psql execution is done with the following:

psql  -n -t -f p.sql -o/dev/null

and also tested with

psql  -n -t -1 -f p.sql -o/dev/null

My question is why is psql so much slower and why us postgresql logging each and every statement in one client but only the whole transaction in the other and wether there is a simple fix to psql.

EDIT Just to clarify, I’m logging the duration not the statement:

In the server I’m getting the following when executing with psql

2012-10-02 12:20:32 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.283 ms
....
2012-10-02 12:20:35 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.285 ms
2012-10-02 12:20:35 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.291 ms
2012-10-02 12:20:35 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.279 ms
2012-10-02 12:20:35 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.284 ms
2012-10-02 12:20:35 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.279 ms
2012-10-02 12:20:35 CEST LOG:  duration: 0.299 ms
....
2012-10-02 12:20:36 CEST LOG:  duration: 5.779 ms

When executing with pgadmin3:

2012-10-02 12:23:21 CEST LOG:  duration: 532.695 ms

User and database are the same in psql and pgadmin3

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T04:54:33+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 4:54 am

    My tip: pgAdmin execute script as one multistatement – so there is less network (protocol) overhead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.