Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7621989
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T04:20:17+00:00 2026-05-31T04:20:17+00:00

I’ve been reading that using static variables in a class that’s never instantiated is

  • 0

I’ve been reading that using static variables in a class that’s never instantiated is a bad idea, because the variables may turn null when the class is not longer in memory. Makes sense.

This is what I’ve been doing for an example

public class MasterParameters {

public static boolean           DEBUG_MODE =                true;
protected MasterParameters(){
    // Exists only to defeat instantiation.
}

}

I’ve also heard using a Singleton is equally bad and people suggest using “dependency injection” — This seems complicated and overkill for what I need, however. Am I just not looking at the right examples?

I want an easy way to define a variable in one spot that can be accessed from anywhere in my code without having to pass a parameters object around. What do you suggest?
Thanks 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T04:20:18+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 4:20 am

    I would suggest Singleton pattern (I know many people don’t like it), but it seems the simplest solution that will work. Take a look at this piece of code:

    public enum Constants {
        INSTANCE;
    
        public void isInDebugMode() { 
            return true;
        }
    }
    

    Here is how you use it (even from static code):

    if(Constants.INSTANCE.isInDebugMode()) {....}
    

    You might also think about some more sophisticated solution:

    public enum Constants {
        DEBUG(true),
        PRINT_VARS(false);
    
        private boolean enabled;
    
        private Constants(boolean enabled) {
            this.enabled = enabled;
        }
    
        public boolean isEnabled() {
            return enabled;
        }
    }
    

    Example usage:

    if(Constants.DEBUG.isEnabled()) {....}
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.