Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’ve been reviewing the C++ standard 03 version. And I’m beginning to get confused with the meanings of the words Should and Shall.
Shall in the standard seems to indicate a compulsory requirement (will-have), where as Should in the standard seems to indicate an optional requirement (could-have). In English, Should implies an expectation, have I misunderstood the meaning? shouldn’t Could be used instead?
From ISO TR 10176, Information technology – Guidelines for the preparation of programming language standards:
3.7 Auxiliary verbs used in this text
3.7.1 shall:
An indication of a requirement on programming language standard or processors.
3.7.2 should:
An indication of a recommendation to programming language standard or processors.
3.7.3 may:
An indication of an optional feature of programming language standard or processors. When this Technical Report provides a recommendation to the programming language standard that supports a specific optional feature, the auxiliary verb “may” is used in the sentence explaining the condition.
This is from the 2002 revision, the current revision is 2003, but I assume it hasn’t changed much. (The current revision appears to be available for 150 euros, a bit steep. I found the 2002 revision here: http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg20/docs/n970-tr10176-2002.pdf.)