Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 846981
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T06:42:22+00:00 2026-05-15T06:42:22+00:00

I’ve been scratching my head for several hours for this… problem: Binary Tree (0)

  • 0

I’ve been scratching my head for several hours for this…

problem:

Binary Tree

   (0)      depth 0
   / \
  10   20   depth 1
 / \   / \
30 40  50 60  depth 2

I am trying to write a function that takes depth as argument and return the sum of values of nodes of the given depth.

For instance, if I pass 2, it should return 180 (i.e. 30+40+50+60)

I decided to use breadth first search and when I find the node with desired depth,
sum up the value, but I just can’t figure out how to find out the way which node is in what depth.
But with this approach I feel like going to totally wrong direction.

function level_order($root, $targetDepth) {
$q = new Queue();
$q->enqueue($root);

while(!$q->isEmpty) {
    //how to determin the depth of the node???
    $node = $q->dequeue();

    if($currentDepth == $targetDepth) {
        $sum = $node->value;
    }

    if($node->left != null) {
        $q->enqueue($node->left);
    }
    if($node->right != null) {
        $q->enqueue($node->right);
    }
    //need to reset this somehow
    $currentDepth ++;
}

}

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T06:42:23+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:42 am

    Just do a depth-first search recursively, keep the current level and sum the nodes at given depth.

    The pseudocode:

    sum(Node, Level) = 
      if (Level == 0) return Node.value;
      else return f(Node.left, Level-1) + 
                  f(Node.right, Level-1).
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.