Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 163879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T11:38:42+00:00 2026-05-11T11:38:42+00:00

I’ve been struggling with event handling in backgroundworker threads. All the documentation I’ve come

  • 0

I’ve been struggling with event handling in backgroundworker threads.

All the documentation I’ve come across make me believe that when a DoWork event handler throws an exception that exception should be dealt with in the RunWorkerCompleted handler and that exception will be available in the Error property of the RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs.

This is fine, but during debug time I always see an exception unhandled by user code message. This makes me believe there is a problem with my approach.

What steps should I take to resolve this?

Regards, Jonathan

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T11:38:42+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:38 am

    I’ve seen this behavior before, and I’ve gotten around it by decorating the DoWork handler with the System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCode attribute:

    [System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCode] void bw_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e) { ... } 

    Note that you’ll only see this if you’re running in the debugger; even without the attribute, all is as it should be when running from the shell.

    I looked this up again, and I still can’t see any good reason why you need to do this. I’m calling it a debugger misfeature.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.