Home/ Questions/Q 152721
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T09:40:26+00:00

I’ve been tasked with setting up a continuous integration server for our project and

  • 0

I’ve been tasked with setting up a continuous integration server for our project and am weighing up the options.

I would like to use cc.rb rather than cc for the simple fact that I’d rather be writing Ruby than XML. From what I can see cc is a more mature product and comes with more features out of the box.

So I would like to know if you were setting up an integration server with the following requirements, which system would you choose and how would you go about it?

  • Mercurial support
  • Run selenium test suite on multiple platforms
  • x10 support for build lights (not essential)

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Regards,

Chris

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. yup I agree, hudson is much more easier to manage and has a variety of nifty plugins that make it flexible

    It does have mercurial support http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Mercurial+Plugin

    Selenium support is also available http://thinkvitamin.com/dev/easy-automated-web-application-testing-with-hudson-and-selenium/

    • 0