Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 611951
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:50:25+00:00 2026-05-13T17:50:25+00:00

I’ve been teaching myself LINQ recently and applying it to various little puzzles. However,

  • 0

I’ve been teaching myself LINQ recently and applying it to various little puzzles. However, one of the problems I have run into is that LINQ-to-objects only works on generic collections. Is there a secret trick/ best practice for converting a non-generic collection to a generic collection?

My current implementation copies the non-generic collection to an array then operates on that, but I was wondering if there was a better way?

public static int maxSequence(string str)
{
    MatchCollection matches = Regex.Matches(str, "H+|T+");
    Match[] matchArr = new Match[matches.Count];
    matches.CopyTo(matchArr, 0);
    return matchArr
        .Select(match => match.Value.Length)
        .OrderByDescending(len => len)
        .First();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:50:25+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:50 pm

    The simplest way is usually the Cast extension method:

    IEnumerable<Match> strongMatches = matches.Cast<Match>();
    

    Note that this is deferred and streams its data, so you don’t have a full “collection” as such – but it’s a perfectly fine data source for LINQ queries.

    Cast is automatically called if you specify a type for the range variable in a query expression:

    So to convert your query completely:

    public static int MaxSequence(string str)
    {      
        return (from Match match in Regex.Matches(str, "H+|T+")
                select match.Value.Length into matchLength
                orderby matchLength descending
                select matchLength).First();
    }
    

    or

    public static int MaxSequence(string str)
    {      
        MatchCollection matches = Regex.Matches(str, "H+|T+");
        return matches.Cast<Match>()
                      .Select(match => match.Value.Length)
                      .OrderByDescending(len => len)
                      .First();
    }
    

    In fact, you don’t need to call OrderByDescending and then First here – you just want the maximal value, which the Max method gets you. Even better, it lets you specify a projection from a source element type to the value you’re trying to find, so you can do without the Select too:

    public static int MaxSequence(string str)
    {      
        MatchCollection matches = Regex.Matches(str, "H+|T+");
        return matches.Cast<Match>()
                      .Max(match => match.Value.Length);
    }
    

    If you have a collection which has some elements of the right type but some which may not be, you can use OfType instead. Cast throws an exception when it encounters an item of the “wrong” type; OfType just skips over it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.