Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3979122
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T05:07:52+00:00 2026-05-20T05:07:52+00:00

I’ve been trying to read and understand a bit more about better code and

  • 0

I’ve been trying to read and understand a bit more about better code and design with Javascript, and really the lack of tutorials explicitly describing about the benifts / uses of creating code in a different way than what a majority of the online code has.

I came across the following code (below) and realized about assigning functions to variables, however am still trying to understand the benifit / how to use this to my advantage.

Is this prototyping, using closure, or just a neat stylized way of doing something instead of doing it in the normal sense of:

Function doThis(el, type, fn){ ... }

My main question is why would you use this method below, and what are the benifits to it?

Thank you in advance your your help and patience.

var addEvent = function() {
  if (window.addEventListener) {
    return function(el, type, fn) {
      el.addEventListener(type, fn, false);
    };
  } else if (window.attachEvent) {
    return function(el, type, fn) {
      var f = function() {
        fn.call(el, window.event);
      };
      el.attachEvent('on' + type, f);
    };
  }
}();

Source: Javascript Tutorial

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T05:07:52+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 5:07 am

    It looks like a speed optimization over simply defining the function.

    Imagine you had

    Function addEvent(el, type, fn){
       if (window.addEventListener) {
          el.addEventListener(type, fn, false);
       } else if (window.attachEvent) {
          var f = function() {
             fn.call(el, window.event);
           };
          el.attachEvent('on' + type, f);
       }
    }
    

    This is a cross-browser function to add an event that works the same as the example you posted. The difference comes when you have thousands of addEvent calls.

    In the example you posted, the function is “simplified” and “materialized” for each browser type at start time (notice the “();” at the end)

    you will get either

    var addEvent = function(el, type, fn) {
      el.addEventListener(type, fn, false);
    };
    

    or

    var addEvent= function(el, type, fn) {
      var f = function() {
        fn.call(el, window.event);
      };
      el.attachEvent('on' + type, f);
    };
    

    depending on the browser. The choice will never be re-evaluated afterwards (it would be useless since the browser will not change during execution 😉 . Hence the function is avoiding 1 or 2 tests everytime the addEvent function is called ! This can make a difference for such an heavy usage function like addEvent.

    I hope this will help you,

    Jerome Wagner

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.