Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7178823
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:59:53+00:00 2026-05-28T16:59:53+00:00

I’ve been trying to sort out the relationship between unique and index in Postgres

  • 0

I’ve been trying to sort out the relationship between unique and index in Postgres after reading the docs on index uniqueness being an implementation detail:

The preferred way to add a unique constraint to a table is ALTER TABLE … ADD CONSTRAINT. The use of indexes to enforce unique
constraints could be considered an implementation detail that should
not be accessed directly. One should, however, be aware that there’s
no need to manually create indexes on unique columns; doing so would
just duplicate the automatically-created index.

So taking the docs at their word I’m going to just declare things as unique and use the implicit index – or – create an index and not assume that the values are unique. Is this a mistake? 

What kind of index will I be getting from unique? Given that only a btree will accept the unique constraint and unique implicitly creates an index is it true that UNIQUE creates a btree index? I don’t want to be running ranges on a hash index inadvertently. 

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:59:54+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:59 pm

    create an index and not assume that the values are unique

    It is safe to assume that values are unique, if you have a unique index defined. That’s how unique constraints are implemented (at the time being, and probably in all future versions as well).

    Defining a UNIQUE constraint does effectively the same (almost, see below) as creating a unique index without specifying the index type. And, I quote the manual:

    Choices are btree, hash, gist, and gin. The default method is btree.

    Adding a constraint is just the canonical way that would not break in future versions where it could be implemented differently. That’s all.

    And no, a unique constraint can only be implemented with a basic btree index in all versions up to and including PostgreSQL v14. Quoting the paragraph "ADD table_constraint_using_index" in the manual:

    The index cannot have expression columns nor be a partial index. Also,
    it must be a b-tree index with default sort ordering.

    Other differences?

    • Unique constraints can be deferred. That is not possible for unique indexes. Have a look at the SET CONSTRAINTS command and follow the links for more.

    Related:

    • NULL values for referential_constraints.unique_constraint_* columns in information schema
    • Is unique index better than unique constraint when I need an index with an operator class
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have an MVC Razor view @{ ViewBag.Title = Index; var c = (char)146;
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.