Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 30965
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T13:31:50+00:00 2026-05-10T13:31:50+00:00

I’ve been using a lot of new .NET 3.5 features in the work that

  • 0

I’ve been using a lot of new .NET 3.5 features in the work that I’ve been doing, lately. The application that I’m building is intended for distribution among consumers who will probably not have the latest version (or perhaps any version) of the .NET framework on their machines.

I went to go download the .NET 3.5 redistributable package only to find out that it’s almost 200 MB! This is unacceptable for my application, because it’s supposed to be a quick and painless consumer application that installs quickly and keeps a low profile on the user’s machine. For users that have .NET 3.5 already installed, our binary downloads have been instantaneous, so far. This 200 MB gorilla will more than quadruple the size of the download. Is there any other option than this redistributable package that I can use to make sure the framework is on the machine that won’t take the user out of our ‘quick and painless’ workflow? Our target time from beginning of download to finalizing the install is less than two minutes. Is it just not possible for someone who doesn’t already have .NET installed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T13:31:50+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 1:31 pm

    That’s one of the sad reasons i’m still targeting .net 2.0 whenever possible :/

    But people don’t neccessarily need the full 200 MB Package. There is a 3 MB Bootstrapper which will only download the required components:

    .net 3.5 SP1 Bootstrapper

    However, the worst case scenario is still a pretty hefty download. Also, see this article for a more detailed explanation on the size and an alternative workaround to the size problem.

    Addition: Since answering this question, Scott Hanselman created SmallestDotNet.com, which will determine the smallest required download. Doesn’t change the worst case scenario, but is still useful to know.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.