Question

I’ve been using relational databases + object relational mappers for object persistence.
I don’t think this is a truly adequate solution for persistence, because it adds unnecessary overhead. It also forces me to fit objects in a table-like structure, which sometimes can’t be done gracefully – it’s like fitting a square in a circle – it won’t work well.

Now, I am aware that there are object-oriented databases out there, but for one thing they lack support, and also the relational model works for most of the data – just not all of it.

So, are there DBMS that support both object-oriented and relational records? Ie: I would be able have records in a (relational) table or a collection of objects depending on what I am working on?

Answer 1

You may want to research NoSQL as an alternative to a typical relational store.