Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’ve been using SubSonic 2 & 2.2 for a few years now with Sql Server.
For my new job I just recently used SubSonic 2.2 with Oracle and ran into a few small issues.
Example: It could not find a column in a table at run time even though it found it during the mapping.
Does SubSonic 3 offer better Oracle support than 2.2 ?
It seems that SubSonic 2.2 does not support Stored Procs
and SubSonic 3 does not work at all for Oracle
I have not used subsonic 3 with oracle. But have used with sql server.
The Difference between subsonic versions.
It works great and with the new features.
You can find the oracle templates and other subsonic 3 docs here.
I would recommand to go for the subsonic 3.