Question

I’ve been wondering if there’s an easy way to push and pull a local branch with a remote branch with a different name without always specifying both names.

For example:

$ git clone myrepo.git
$ git checkout -b newb
$ ...
$ git commit -m "Some change"
$ git push origin newb:remote_branch_name

Now if someone updates remote_branch_name, I can:

$ git pull

And everything is merged / fast-forwarded. However, if I make changes in my local “newb”, I can’t:

$ git push

Instead, I have to:

% git push origin newb:remote_branch_name

Seems a little silly. If git-pull uses git-config branch.newb.merge to determine where to pull from, why couldn’t git-push have a similar config option? Is there a nice shortcut for this or should I just continue the long way?

Answer 1

Sure. Just set your push.default to upstream to push branches to their upstreams (which is the same that pull will pull from, defined by branch.newb.merge), rather than pushing branches to ones matching in name (which is the default setting for push.default, matching).

git config push.default upstream

Note that this used to be called tracking not upstream before Git 1.7.4.2, so if you’re using an older version of Git, use tracking instead. The push.default option was added in Git 1.6.4, so if you’re on an older version than that, you won’t have this option at all and will need to explicitly specify the branch to push to.