Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 741249
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T08:36:38+00:00 2026-05-14T08:36:38+00:00

I’ve been wondering whether using prototypes in JavaScript should be more memory efficient than

  • 0

I’ve been wondering whether using prototypes in JavaScript should be more memory efficient than attaching every member of an object directly to it for the following reasons:

  • The prototype is just one single object.
  • The instances hold only references to their prototype.

Versus:

  • Every instance holds a copy of all the members and methods that are defined by the constructor.

I started a little experiment with this:

var TestObjectFat = function()
    {
        this.number = 42;
        this.text = randomString(1000);
    }

var TestObjectThin = function()
    {
        this.number = 42;
    }
TestObjectThin.prototype.text = randomString(1000);

randomString(x) just produces a, well, random String of length x.

I then instantiated the objects in large quantities like this:

var arr = new Array();
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    arr.push(new TestObjectFat()); // or new TestObjectThin()
}

and checked the memory usage of the browser process (Google Chrome). I know, that’s not very exact…

However, in both cases the memory usage went up significantly as expected (about 30 MB for TestObjectFat), but the prototype variant used not much less memory (about 26 MB for TestObjectThin).

I also checked that the TestObjectThin instances contain the same string in their “text” property, so they are really using the property of the prototype.

Now, I’m not so sure what to think about this. The prototyping doesn’t seem to be the big memory saver at all.

I know that prototyping is a great idea for many other reasons, but I’m specifically concerned with memory usage here. Any explanations why the prototype variant uses almost the same amount of memory? Am I missing something?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T08:36:39+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:36 am

    Your test is suspect – there is a significant overhead in allocating JavaScript objects which is likely skewing your results. If you insert large blobs of data into your prototype class, it may show a larger gain.

    Unfortunately memory usage is hard to control in JavaScript, especially when JIT is involved (are your JITed methods represented in the memory usage model? etc).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 415k
  • Answers 415k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer For each user, select all users with which he is… May 15, 2026 at 9:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer How do you add the class="active" to the correct button… May 15, 2026 at 9:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think that you can download the data from your… May 15, 2026 at 9:06 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.