Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6113253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T14:50:15+00:00 2026-05-23T14:50:15+00:00

I’ve been working on a javascript library, and I have a lot of redundant

  • 0

I’ve been working on a javascript library, and I have a lot of redundant checks like this:

if(typeof foo !== "undefined" && foo !== null)

So, I wanted to create a function that will be a shortcut to this unwieldy check. So I came up with this:

function isset(a) 
{
     return (typeof a !== "undefined" && a !== null) ? true : false;
}

But, since the value could be undefined, and it attempts to use a possibly undefined variable, it turns out to be useless.

Is there a way to accomplish this without have to extend a native prototype?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T14:50:16+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:50 pm

    It really depends on what you mean by undefined.

    1. You mean the variable does not exist.

    In this case, what you want is not possible. typeof is an operator and therefore has magic behavior you just can’t emulate using the language. If you try to pass a variable that doesn’t exist to your function, it will throw a ReferenceError.

    (See below for a workaround.)

    2. You mean the variable has the value undefined, but does exist.

    In this case, your function will do the trick — though it could be simplified to the following:

    function isset(variable) {
        return variable != null;
    }
    

    This function will return false if the variable is either undefined or null. It takes advantage of the fact that undefined == null in JavaScript. Of course, with such a short function, one could argue that the function isn’t needed at all.

    Recall that a variable that is declared has a value — undefined — by default.


    The name of your function suggests you mean case #1. I don’t know what sort of library you are writing, but I can’t imagine a case in a library where you would need to check if a variable exists, though I can definitely think of many possibilities for case #2.

    If case #1 is necessary, remember that you can re-declare variables without changing their value:

    a = 1; // pretend this was set somewhere higher up in the code
    var a; // this does not change the value of `a`
    

    If you re-declare variables before you use isset, you could avoid the ReferenceError problem. You won’t be able to tell if the code has already declared the variable, though; you will only be able to tell if they have not assigned it to some other value.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.