Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 550923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T11:20:22+00:00 2026-05-13T11:20:22+00:00

I’ve been working on a thread which will live as long as the application

  • 0

I’ve been working on a thread which will live as long as the application is running, and runs at a interval of 500ms. I noted that I could be uselessly processing if there’s nothing in the queue for it to process, so I went around looking at some sources I had locally, and I found an example close to mine, but it’s in Java.

The example had this:

synchronized(this) {
    try {
        wait();
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        cleanup();
        break;
    }
}

Inside a while loop which goes on forever.

The thread has this to notify the wait:

synchronized(this) {
    notifyAll();
}

This was inside the enqueue thread.
I’d also like you to note that the class inherits Runnable.

Could anyone quickly explain the corresponding functions in C#? And maybe an example if you could!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T11:20:22+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:20 am

    .NET/C# best practice would be to use an EventWaitHandle.

    You’d have some variable shared between the threads as so:

    EventWaitHandle handle = new EventWaitHandle(false, EventResetMode.AutoReset);
    

    In the consumer thread (the one that you’re waking up every 500ms right now), you’d loop waiting for the handle (perhaps with a timeout):

    try
    {
        while(true)
        {
            handle.WaitOne();
            doSomething();
        }
    }
    catch(ThreadAbortException)
    {
        cleanup();
    }
    

    And in the producer thread:

    produceSomething();
    handle.Set();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.