Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3400516
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T04:54:09+00:00 2026-05-18T04:54:09+00:00

I’ve been working with getters and setters to avoid the prospect of using global

  • 0

I’ve been working with getters and setters to avoid the prospect of using global variables. However, I’ve run into a problem. The below code, which works fine with integer variables, throws an exception when I try to run an AJAX call instead. Can someone explain to me why this is happening?


function Object_XML() {
    me = this;
    me.xml = null;
}

Object_XML.prototype = {

    getXML: function() {
        return me.xml
    },

    setXML: function(data) {
        me.xml = data;  
    },

    loadXML: function() {
        $.ajax({
            type: "GET",
            url: "questions.xml",
            dataType: "xml",
            success: function(xml) {
                me.setXML(xml);         
            } //close success       
        });//close AJAX 
    }//close setXML

};

$(document).ready(function() {  
    var data = new Object_XML();
    alert("This is an " + data.getXML());
    data.setXML();
    alert("This is an " + data.getXML());
});

Thanks, Elliot Bonneville

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T04:54:10+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 4:54 am

    You just negated your use of private variables with getters and setters by using me = this; You just made me a global variable by not using var. (any variable not defined using var gets attached to the global namespace)

    In your case since you’re working within the same object scope you can just use this and avoid the me as personally, i think it’s confusing. But if you want to stick to that paradigm, use var me = this;

    Your example is really unclear, where does the error happen? You’re calling data.setXml() with no parameters, so me.xml will bet set to undefined. That is to be expected if you pass nothing into the method.

    Also keep in mind that due to the async nature of your call, if you were to do something like:

    data.loadXml();
    console.log("data.getXML();", data.getXML());  // would be undefined
    

    data.getXML() at that moment would still be undefined as it’s likely your asynchronous call hasn’t returned yet, thus not setting the xml attribute of your object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.