Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3217612
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:25:53+00:00 2026-05-17T15:25:53+00:00

I’ve come across a query that is taking too long. The query has 50+

  • 0

I’ve come across a query that is taking “too long”. The query has 50+ left joins between 10 or so tables. To give a brief overview of the database model, the tables joined are tables that store data for a particular data type (ex: date_fields, integer_fields, text_fields, etc.) and each has a column for the value, a “datafield” id, and a ticket id. The query is built programmatically based on an association table between a “ticket” and its “data fields”.

The join statements look something like the following:

...FROM tickets t
LEFT JOIN ticket_text_fields t001 ON(t.id=t001.ticket_id AND t001.textfield_id=7)
...
LEFT JOIN ticket_date_fields t056 ON(t.id=t056.ticket_id AND t056.datafield_id=434)

When using explain on the query shows the following:

1   SIMPLE   t       ref   idx_dataset_id                   idx_dataset_id  5   const   2871   Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
1   SIMPLE   t001   ref   idx_ticket_id,idx_datafield_id   idx_ticket_id   5   t.id   5   
... 
1   SIMPLE   t056   ref   idx_ticket_id,idx_datafield_id   idx_ticket_id   5   t.id   8

What direction can I take to tune this query? All the indexes seem to be in place. Perhaps the t table (tickets) row number (2871) should be reduced. How many left joins is too much? Should the datafield tables be joined only once and then queried each for the data that is required?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:25:54+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:25 pm

    You’re using a variation of the terrible antipattern called Entity-Attribute-Value. You’re storing attributes on separate rows, so if you want to reconstruct something that looks like a conventional row of data, you need to make one join per attribute.

    It’s not surprising this creates a query with 50 joins. This is far too many for most databases to run efficiently (you haven’t identified which database you’re using). Eventually you’ll want a few more attributes and you might exceed some architectural limit of the database on the number of joins it can do.

    The solution is: don’t reconstruct the row in SQL.

    Instead, query the attributes as multiple rows, instead of trying to combine them onto a single row.

    SELECT ... FROM tickets t
    INNER JOIN ticket_text_fields f ON t.id=f.ticket_id
    WHERE f.textfield_id IN (7, 8, 9, ...)
    UNION ALL
    SELECT ... FROM tickets t
    INNER JOIN ticket_date_fields d ON t.id=d.ticket_id
    WHERE d.datafield_id IN (434, 435, 436, ...)
    

    Then you have to write a function in your application to loop over the resulting rowset, and collect the attributes one by one into an object in application space, so then you can use it as if it’s a single entity.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.