Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7571017
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T15:33:55+00:00 2026-05-30T15:33:55+00:00

I’ve created table with inputs with onchange handlers to do some math; so for

  • 0

I’ve created table with inputs with onchange handlers to do some math;
so for example:

jQuery(<selector will find many elements>).keyup(function (){do something})

Now there is a problem when I want to .append new table elements. They don’t response to keyup…
Is there a way to automagicaly bind new element (I’m using .clone) with existing .keyup (or any other event)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T15:33:57+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 3:33 pm

    You should use event delegation. Event delegation takes advantage of the fact that events “bubbles” through the DOM, which means that many elements receive a notification of an event of one of its descendant elements.

    With jQuery, this is even easier, since it smooths over some of the cross-browser inconsistencies of event handling and event bubbling.

    Now, let’s say that you want to bind an event handler to each row in a table. A straight-forward, but inefficient, way of handling this is to bind an event handler to each row. This is effectively what you are doing now. Imagine, instead, that you bind a single handler to the table, and say “Hey, invoke this handler whenever something happens to one of my rows“. This is what event delegation is all about. With jQuery 1.7, the interface for event handling has been refactored and made more consistent. Here is an example of how to bind such a handler:

    $('table.math').on(
      /*
       * This first argument is a map (object) of events and their corresponding
       * event handlers, like so: {eventName: eventHandler ([e]) {})
       */
      {
        keyup: function doMath (e) {
          // Your event handling code here. 
          // "this" refers to the input where the keyUp-event occured
        }
      },
      /* This argument is a selector, and reads: 
       * 'For table with class "math", bind to the events listed above
       * whenever a corresponding event occurs on an input with class
       * "mathInput"
       */
      'input.mathInput'
    );
    

    An additional benefit of event delegation is that it fulfills your criteria “there is a problem when I want to .append new table elements. They don’t response to keyup“. With event delegation this automatically works for all descendants that match the selector, whether they are present when the handler is bound, or inserted dynamically later.

    To summarize, event delegation:

    • is more efficient. You bind a single handler instead of many
    • works for dynamically inserted elements
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
i got an object with contents of html markup in it, for example: string

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.