Home/ Questions/Q 110029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T02:09:45+00:00

I’ve decided I want to get more into native code development with C++. I’m

  • 0

I’ve decided I want to get more into native code development with C++. I’m trying to decide if I would be better served using CodeGear C++ Builder 2009 or Visual Studio 2008. I currently use Delphi 2007, so I’m very comfortable with C++ Builder’s IDE (its the same as Delphi), as well as the VCL and RTL.

I’ve never been a big fan of MFC (from the first time I played around with it in the VS 6.0 days), but haven’t taken a close look at it since then.

I’m interested in hearing from some experts that have experience with both IDE’s, whether they are the most recent versions or not.

Right now, I’m leaning towards C++ Builder because I believe the VCL is much more robust and easier to work with than MFC — but as I said, it’s been a while since I’ve used MFC. I’m not interested in building programs that rely on the .NET Framework because I’m partly teaching myself native development. Is MFC still king for Windows C++? Or is WTL or ATL the big thing?

Any C++ gurus out there want to share their opinions?

EDIT: I understand MFC is not the only gui toolkit for Visual Studio. However, I’m looking for some recommendations based on GUI toolkit + IDE. For C++ Builder, there is only 1 real option, which is C++ Builder + the VCL. For VS 2008, it’s VS + MFC/ATL/WTL/QT….confusing for me since I don’t know much about them.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Coming from Delphi, you’ll find the VCL straightforward to use with C++ Builder. There are a few oddities, like C++ doesn’t hide the fact that TObjects are all really pointers (which Delphi hides from you), and some things like array properties are accessed differently.

    Two or three years back, I was looking for any way out of C++Builder, but now, with recent releases (and Embarcadero’s purchase of Codegear), I’m happy with the product and the direction.

    You’ll find the number of string types and the assorted potential incompatibilities quite painful with C++Builder, but you’ll get used to it! (std::string, char[], wchar_t[], TCHAR, AnsiString, WideString, UnicodeString and String to name a few)

    Personally I’d vote for C++ Builder – because of two-way RAD and the VCL, although it may not be the best way of learning modern C++ idioms.

    • 0