Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8570831
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T18:38:52+00:00 2026-06-11T18:38:52+00:00

I’ve defined a class that takes a list of the form [fname1,[parameters1],fname2,[parameters2],…] as parameter

  • 0

I’ve defined a class that takes a list of the form [fname1,[parameters1],fname2,[parameters2],…] as parameter for the creation of an instance.

The idea is for the instance to execute all functions in the list at once, passing them their respective parameters – which works just fine as is, but the implementation I came up with is incredibly ugly.
It looks something like this:

# (The input list is split up and transformed into two lists -
# one containing the function names as strings, the other one containing tuples)
# (It then runs a for-loop containing the following statement)

exec '%s%s'%(fname[i],repr(parameter_tuple[i]))

Which outputs and runs ‘fname(parameters,more_parameters,and,so,on)’, just as it should do.

I don’t know why, but since I coded this, I consequently get the idea that I deserve a really good beating for it… although it works, I just know there has to be a less ugly implementation.
Anyone willing to help me see it? Or maybe to beat me up a bit? 😉

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T18:38:53+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 6:38 pm

    The simplest answer here, if you can do it, is to simply pass the functions rather than the function names, and then do a simple:

    for function, params in zip(functions, parameters):
        function(*params)
    

    Note my use of zip() to loop over two lists at once. This is the far more Pythonic option than looping over indices.

    Or, alternatively, use itertools.starmap().

    If you truly cannot pass the functions directly, it becomes more difficult. For one, any solution relying on the names of variables will be inherently fragile, so the best option would be to create an explicit dictionary from function names to functions, then look up the function.

    Otherwise, I would suggest using the inspect module to find the functions you want. E.g:

    import inspect
    import sys
    
    def some_function():
           ...
    
    print(dict(inspect.getmembers(sys.modules[__name__], inspect.isfunction)))
    

    Produces:

    {'some_function': <function some_function at 0x7faec13005a0>}
    

    Note, however, this is far less efficient and more roundabout. The best answer remains passing the functions themselves.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I have a text area in my form which accepts all possible characters from
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.