Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 268923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T23:45:29+00:00 2026-05-11T23:45:29+00:00

I’ve deployed a .NET website to a 2008 (IIS7) server and the site seems

  • 0

I’ve deployed a .NET website to a 2008 (IIS7) server and the site seems to fly for up to 30-50 concurrent users. When load testing it the site comes to a grinding halt sometime after 100 concurrent users. Page loads go from 1.5 seconds to 90+

w3wp hits 100% and stays that way until I stop the load test. SQL on the other hand idles at about 2-3%.

I took a trace with debug diag and the report points to one of the threads that is taking up 11.358 cpu time vs 0.687 for the closest runner up. It’s great that I’ve found the culprit, however I have no idea what to make of the info that I’ve been given. Here’s the report output.

Thread 19 – System ID 4016 Entry point
0x00000000 Create time 7/8/2009
9:28:53 PM Time spent in user mode
0 Days 00:00:11.187 Time spent in
kernel mode 0 Days 00:00:00.171

Function Source
ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+c
kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+be
mscorwks!PEImage::LoadImage+1af
mscorwks!CLREvent::WaitEx+117
mscorwks!CLREvent::Wait+17
mscorwks!ThreadpoolMgr::SafeWait+73
mscorwks!ThreadpoolMgr::WorkerThreadStart+11c
mscorwks!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+49
kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+e ntdll!__RtlUserThreadStart+23

ntdll!_RtlUserThreadStart+1b

Any help is appreciated!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T23:45:30+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:45 pm

    I recommend you use a higher-level profiler. Here’s a list:

    • JetBrains’ dotTrace
    • Red-Gate ANTS
    • Automated QA’s AQTime
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.