Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7500413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T20:10:33+00:00 2026-05-29T20:10:33+00:00

I’ve found in internet the implementation of __sync_val_compare_and_swap : #define LOCK_PREFIX lock ; struct

  • 0

I’ve found in internet the implementation of __sync_val_compare_and_swap:

#define LOCK_PREFIX "lock ; "

struct __xchg_dummy { unsigned long a[100]; };
#define __xg(x) ((struct __xchg_dummy *)(x))

static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
                  unsigned long new, int size)
{
   unsigned long prev;
   switch (size) {
   case 1:
      __asm__ __volatile__(LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgb %b1,%2"
                 : "=a"(prev)
                 : "q"(new), "m"(*__xg(ptr)), "0"(old)
                 : "memory");
      return prev;
   case 2:
      __asm__ __volatile__(LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgw %w1,%2"
                 : "=a"(prev)
                 : "q"(new), "m"(*__xg(ptr)), "0"(old)
                 : "memory");
      return prev;
   case 4:
      __asm__ __volatile__(LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %1,%2"
                 : "=a"(prev)
                 : "q"(new), "m"(*__xg(ptr)), "0"(old)
                 : "memory");
      return prev;
   }
   return old;
}

#define cmpxchg(ptr,o,n)\
   ((__typeof__(*(ptr)))__cmpxchg((ptr),(unsigned long)(o),\
               (unsigned long)(n),sizeof(*(ptr))))

When I compile and use this function (cmpxchg) for i386 architecture – all good! But, when i compile under Sparc architecture, i’ve the following error:

error: impossible constraint in `asm'

What’s the problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T20:10:34+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 8:10 pm

    On Solaris, better don’t write your own code for this (neither on SPARC nor on x86); rather, use the atomic_cas(3C) functions for the purpose:

    static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
                  unsigned long new, int size)
    {
        switch (size) {
        case 1: return atomic_cas_8(ptr, (unsigned char)old, (unsigned char)new);
        case 2: return atomic_cas_16(ptr, (unsigned short)old, (unsigned short)new);
        case 4: return atomic_cas_32(ptr, (unsigned int)old, (unsigned int)new);
    #ifdef _LP64
        case 8: return atomic_cas_64(ptr, old, new);
    #endif
        default: break;    
        }
        return old;
    }
    

    That’ll do for Solaris.

    Edit: if you absolutely have to inline this kind of thing, the SPARC (v8+, aka UltraSPARC) instruction to use is “compare and swap”, aka CAS. It’s always atomic (sparc doesn’t know lock prefixes). It only comes in 32bit and 64bit (CASX) variants, so that the 8/16bit library functions perform 32bit CAS masking out the non-targeted word/bytes. I won’t help with reimplementing that – it’s not a good idea, use the library interfaces.

    Edit2: Some help with reimplementing you get by reading the sourcecode (if you cannot link with Solaris libc).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
public static bool CheckLogin(string Username, string Password, bool AutoLogin) { bool LoginSuccessful; // Trim
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.