Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 38553
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:43:34+00:00 2026-05-10T14:43:34+00:00

I’ve got a collection that implements an interface that extends both IList<T> and List.

  • 0

I’ve got a collection that implements an interface that extends both IList<T> and List.

public Interface IMySpecialCollection : IList<MyObject>, IList { ... } 

That means I have two versions of the indexer.

I wish the generic implementation to be used, so I implement that one normally:

public MyObject this[int index] { .... } 

I only need the IList version for serialization, so I implement it explicitly, to keep it hidden:

object IList.this[int index] { ... } 

However, in my unit tests, the following

MyObject foo = target[0]; 

results in a compiler error

The call is ambiguous between the following methods or properties

I’m a bit surprised at this; I believe I’ve done it before and it works fine. What am I missing here? How can I get IList<T> and IList to coexist within the same interface?

Edit IList<T> does not implement IList, and I must implement IList for serialization. I’m not interested in workarounds, I want to know what I’m missing.

Edit again: I’ve had to drop IList from the interface and move it on my class. I don’t want to do this, as classes that implement the interface are eventually going to be serialized to Xaml, which requires collections to implement IDictionary or IList…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:43:34+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:43 pm

    You can’t do this with

    public interface IMySpecialCollection : IList<MyObject>, IList { ... }

    But you can do what you want with a class, you will need to make the implementations for one of the interfaces explicit. In my example I made IList explicit.

    public class MySpecialCollection : IList<MyObject>, IList { ... }

    IList<object> myspecialcollection = new MySpecialCollection(); IList list = (IList)myspecialcollection;

    Have you considered having IMySpecialCollection implement ISerializable for serialization? Supporting multiple collection types seems a bit wrong to me. You may also want to look at casting yout IList to IEnumerable for serialization since IList just wraps IEnumerable and ICollection.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 76k
  • Answers 76k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Install local::lib. It will handle all the configuration for you. May 11, 2026 at 3:14 pm
  • added an answer The default plugin versions are inherited from the Super POM,… May 11, 2026 at 3:14 pm
  • added an answer WiX is excellent. Here is a good MSDN article on… May 11, 2026 at 3:14 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.