Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 205093
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:31:33+00:00 2026-05-11T17:31:33+00:00

I’ve got a function here that is meant to look through a list of

  • 0

I’ve got a function here that is meant to look through a list of tuples and find the second value in the tuple by taking in the first value. Here’s the function so far:

lookup :: String -> [(String,String)] -> String
lookup _ _ [] = "Not found"
lookup x y zs = if (notFound x zs)
    then "Not found"
    else (head [b | (a,b) <- zs, (a==x)])

The notFound function just returns a Bool as true if there is no tuple containing the given first string. Problem is, I get this type error in Hugs:

ERROR "find.hs" (line 22): Type error in explicitly typed binding
*** Term           : lookup
*** Type           : String -> [(String,String)] -> [a] -> String
*** Does not match : String -> [(String,String)] -> String

I’m thinking it’s something to do with the dummy “Not found” value having a different type to the string from the generated list, but I’m not sure.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:31:33+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:31 pm

    I think your explicit type-declaration is wrong. You have:

    lookup :: String -> [(String,String)] -> String
    

    but I think it should be

    lookup :: String -> String -> [(String,String)] -> String
    

    Actually, after taking another look at it, it looks like you’re not using the 2nd parameter “y”. So you could remove it and the underscore like so

    lookup :: String -> [(String,String)] -> String
    lookup _ [] = "Not found"
    lookup x zs = if (notFound x zs)
      then "Not found"
      else (head [b | (a,b) <- zs, (a==x)])
    

    This will allow you to keep the type declaration you have.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 100k
  • Answers 100k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Browsers are designed in such way because of security risks.… May 11, 2026 at 7:58 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From your code, you never set the datePicker's date to… May 11, 2026 at 7:58 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Subversion working copy performs quite badly when there's a… May 11, 2026 at 7:58 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.